Mesothelioma & Injury Lawyers: Belluck & Fox, LLP
INDIVIDUALIZED LEGAL RESPRESENTATION
of SERIOUS INJURY CASES

MVP and Vinorelbine for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Source: Lancet

In July of this year, The Lancet published an article describing the results of a study that compared the efficacy of a chemotherapy regimen utilizing mitomycin, vinblastine and cisplatin (MVP) or vinorelbine to a treatment regimen featuring best supportive care and active symptom control for patients with mesothelioma. The study showed that neither the MVP regimen nor the vinorelbine regimen showed any statistically significant improvement in extending patient life over the symptom control regimen. However, the authors concluded that vinorelbine deserves more study because there was some evidence to indicate a possible survival benefit to the treatment, even though it did not achieve statistical significance.

The latest edition of The Lancet has published a letter criticizing that study and its conclusions, as well as a reply by the authors of the original study. The letter attacked the design of the study and the pathology analysis conducted during it, as well as the authors’ conclusion that the use of vinorelbine to treat pleural mesothelioma deserved more research. The letter noted that while active symptom control and vinorelbine were more tolerable than pemetrexed (Alimta), the latter is still the only chemotherapy agent to demonstrate statistically significant improvements in median survival times for mesothelioma patients, so patients who can tolerate it should be treated with pemetrexed.

In their reply, the authors’ defend their study and their conclusion that vinorelbine warrants more research. They state that the recommendation to continue research on vinorelbine is warranted by their demonstration of some survival benefit, even though their results were not conclusive and were not presented as such. The authors state that a two month survival benefit in some of the patients treated with the chemo agent alone justifies the call for more research, especially considering how so few therapies have shown any benefit for the treatment of mesothelioma. They conclude that the future of mesothelioma diagnoses and treatment regimens is the identification of specific biomarkers and the development of truly targeted therapies.

Labels: , ,

    SEARCH THIS SITE
   

Mesothelioma Asbestos Motorcycle Accidents Lead Paint
Your state's law may limit your time to bring a legal claim. To protect your rights, you need to have your personal injury claim evaluated immediately. To have your claim evaluated, please fill out this form or contact us at: bfinfo@belluckfox.com

Response Within 24 Hours!



Name:
Phone:
Email:
How did you hear about us?
Comments / Questions

Powered by Blogger

We will respond to all inquiries within 24 hours.
© Belluck & Fox, L.L.P. All rights reserved. Disclaimer
Belluck & Fox - Personal Injury & Mesothelioma Attorneys Who We Are | What We Do | Questions & Answers | Submit Your Claim
Recent News | Testimonials | Legal Links | Additional Legal Resources
Our Community | Legal Glossary | Disclaimer | Referring Attorneys | Client’s Rights
Site Map | Contact | Home
  Mesothelioma Lawyers | Asbestos Exposure | Asbestos & Mesothelioma in NY
Benzene Lawyers

Attorney Advertising. Prior Results Do Not Guarantee a Similar Outcome.

Serious Injury Cases, Asbestos, Benzene, Construction Cases, Crime Victims, Employment Discrimination, Lead Paint, Listeria,
Medical Malpractice, Mesothelioma, Motorcycle Accidents, Personal Injury, Qui Tam, New York False Claims Act

Serving New York - Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, Albany, Utica, Watertown, Ticonderoga, Seneca Falls, Niagara Falls, Troy, Corning, Elmira,
Binghamton, Glens Falls, Poughkeepsie, Kingston, Waterloo, Rome, Ithaca, Jamestown, Olean, Plattsburgh, Massena, Schenectady, Oswego

Website by
Consultwebs.com, Inc. – Legal webs for Serious Personal Injury Lawyers